<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cats pushing for religious status again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.catnabbit.com/cats-pushing-for-religious-status-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.catnabbit.com/cats-pushing-for-religious-status-again/</link>
	<description>News, Humor, Jokes and Satire by Cats, for Cats!</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 06:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hazel</title>
		<link>http://www.catnabbit.com/cats-pushing-for-religious-status-again/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Hazel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catnabbit.com/?p=32#comment-3</guid>
		<description>For such a change, humans would have to submit entirely to cats, and that would definitely interfere with their freedom of religion.  It also may not be physically safe for all humans since many are allergic to cats.  I'm not entirely certain how far this would go if it occurs, but it probably isn't even necessary for all cats/humans to exist in a symbiotic relationship.  Being treated with the respect that a sacred animal deserves may be enough to satisfy the vision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For such a change, humans would have to submit entirely to cats, and that would definitely interfere with their freedom of religion.  It also may not be physically safe for all humans since many are allergic to cats.  I&#8217;m not entirely certain how far this would go if it occurs, but it probably isn&#8217;t even necessary for all cats/humans to exist in a symbiotic relationship.  Being treated with the respect that a sacred animal deserves may be enough to satisfy the vision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gigolo Kitty</title>
		<link>http://www.catnabbit.com/cats-pushing-for-religious-status-again/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Gigolo Kitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catnabbit.com/?p=32#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Would there be a law requiring each human to be owned by a cat? Would that interfere with freedom of religion?
::is anxious to know::</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would there be a law requiring each human to be owned by a cat? Would that interfere with freedom of religion?<br />
::is anxious to know::</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
